To: MileHigh who wrote (19371 ) 4/27/1999 12:56:00 AM From: Dave B Respond to of 93625
OTOTOTOT MileHigh, re: the NC, I gotta disagree. I happen to think the NC was a fairly niche-y idea with limited use. By only working when it was connected to the internet, you limit the use (what happens when the network is down?) and the capabilities. We had this once; it was called time-sharing. A dumb terminal connected to a powerful server that stored your data and ran your programs. The PC replaced much of this for a reason -- "personal service", if you will. You didn't have to compete for processor time, you were assured that your data was secure, and business could still happen if one PC went down (versus everyone being dead in the water if the time-shared server went down). The only niche I think it would have been useful for would have been to replace applications where terminals are in use today. And there aren't many of those left. The NC did accomplish one good thing, though. Whatever else happened, Intel and Microsoft were not going to let the NC be successful. They were going to do whatever they had to do to get the cost of the PC down to kill the NC as quickly as possible (think about it, would you rather have a box that costs $299 that only works when it's connected to the internet, or a box that costs $299 that can do all of the things an NC can do plus more whether or not it's connected to the internet). So Oracle is to thank for causing the price of the PC to come down to a new level that entices a whole new segment of users into the market. (Of course, this was not Larry's plan -- his plan was to have the NC's of the world all tied to Oracle's products, not Microsoft's.) And if we want to, we could simply say that the $299 PC is actually an NC because it can do a superset of those same activities, right? You can still do just the web, if you want to. But once Pandora's box has been opened and people have the power of the PC on their desk, it would have been hard to suffer that step back to a NC. And the author quotes an analyst from the Patricia Seybold group saying that the NC failed because there was no software to back it up. I'd contend that there was no software because no one wanted to write software for a box with so little demand. Just my $1.50. Dave