Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MICHAEL CRAIG who wrote (16147)	4/27/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: Rhino	Respond to of 22810

Michael: What's with the "boo hoo" and stuff like that? I'm trying to have a conversation with you, not an argument. I agree that IF NPEC gets up to $.54 it would be very, very big. I'd love that (even at $.06). But I think there has to be more to "upside potential" than a low starting point. There has to be technology, interest, etc. Would you say Yahoo has "huge upside potential?" I would, and it's price is already through the stratosphere. Anyway, all I'm asking (and as far as I can tell, all that grantsi et al. are asking) is for some concrete reason to believe that NPEC has this potential (By the way, the word potential implies more than wishful thinking. It's an indication that something is within the product/item that justifies believing it will expand/grow.). I'm not worried about NPEC breaking my bank account. It's a small part of a portfolio that, incidentally, is doing GREAT (everything but NPEC, that is). NPEC is my only loser. At least, at this point it's a loser. I wouldn't mind seeing $.54. Please don't view my questions as a critique. They're not. They're just questions, designed to get an answer. Answers are in short-supply around here. Hence, my persistent questions. Rhino