SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (36451)4/27/1999 8:38:00 AM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
I estimated based on a quick looks at a yahoo chart. The scales there must be wrong as are the 200 mda lines on them.

I agree that at 35+ multiple on the s&p and no dividend yield (don't bother mentioning the 1 percent and change...it is zero) that we aren't that stretched. -s-



To: John Pitera who wrote (36451)4/27/1999 8:44:00 AM
From: MythMan  Respond to of 86076
 
this chart says 30% over.
quote.yahoo.com^IXIC&d=1ym

200mda= ~2000 times 1.30 = 2600.



To: John Pitera who wrote (36451)4/27/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: Terry Whitman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86076
 
MATH 101
The divisor is the 200 day MA. Thus I am correct.

% over 200 dayMA = (Current - 200day)/200day

Same as % return on investment = (current - original)/ original



To: John Pitera who wrote (36451)4/27/1999 9:08:00 AM
From: Terry Whitman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Future Myth threader- <g> amcity.com:80/charlotte/stories/1999/04/26/editorial3.html