Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (43322)	4/27/1999 10:10:00 AM
From: SliderOnTheBlack	Respond to of 95453

< It's even more transparent since I was ridiculed for selling UFAB at 9. > I rest my case ! PS - HAL posts good news and sells off - someone sure blew it on the profit taking didn't they.... gee, did anyone think that maybe the ''known'' OPEC compliance was built into $18 Oil and that $18 Oil was built into OSX 72-77 presently and that a one month 50% spike would result in a sell into the news mentality as everyone tries to beat one another to the door to lock in profits.... nahhh - that would be a re-write - HA !

To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (43322)	4/27/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: SargeK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Jim L, Is this the ridicule you refer to: " To: JimL (42865 ) From: SargeK Wednesday, Apr 21 1999 12:13PM ET Reply # of 43372 JimL: "Hope I'm not wrong." I think this rocket has a way to go yet. Different strokes (you know the rest) K" I didn't intend the above post as 'ridicule'. If you took it that way, I am sorry about that. Fact of the matter is after you sold, volume started dropping off the next couple of days and some of CEOs started talking about near term problems and I decided to go ahead and take some profits. Your sell in a small way influenced my own. It obvious where the sentiment lies in this dispute, so I'll bug out. You want him, you got him. SargeK