Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MskiHntr who wrote (26898)	4/27/1999 10:08:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Respond to of 44908

Joe, there is undoubtedly a downside to having Marty on the board, mainly his posting would probably be lost to the board. However, I believe the pro's outweigh the con's. This is not an attempt to have the last word , but the following does call for some clarification. You referred to my "statement" that TSIG's management had been deceitful in order to further their own personal gains. I actually said, "Management may have brought that on themselves by being less than open and straightforward on several occasions." I then asked two rhetorical questions: "Has management been deliberately deceitful to further its own gains? Or was management walking a tightrope in an attempt to avoid outright disaster?" Some people attribute ulterior motives to TSIG management and cite various incidents in which management appears to have acted with impropriety. Since my conversation with Paul Henry, I have realized anew what a tremendous balancing job management has had to do funding exciting new ventures with too little money. Implied in my two rhetorical questions is the suggestion that management was dangerously close to closing the doors and not attempting to deceive and defraud the public for personal gain. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. Regards, Suzanne