Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tfk who wrote (26913)	4/27/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: FREAKAZOID	Respond to of 44908

tfk--> it is a house rule set by TSIG that their employees are not allowed to post on the threads concerning TSIG..not a legal rule. The CEO of PNLK (I believe PNLK) posts regularly on that thread. As long as insider information is not given on the threads it is perfectly legal to post in a public forumn. Marty being on the BOD does not make him an employee, he should be free to post at will..as long as no insider information is given. freak!!

To: tfk who wrote (26913)	4/27/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

The reason Dixie doesn't post is that the risk is not worth the reward.......it's that simple. Why would anyone risk saying something that would be questionable to the SEC and put themselves and anyone on this thread into any jeopardy? When you're on the "other side of the fence" your perspective changes. Just suppose you said the wrong thing and the SEC halted the stock to investigate for insider trading!!!! Everyone would lose! I respect Marty and would support him on the board if he wishes it and the TSIG management wishes it.........but I would want him to protect himself and us by refraining from contact on this thread. I think many of us have lost sight of the facts here: We are all just a bunch of anonymous posters blowing hot air in the form of typed messages. PatT.com