SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gord Bolton who wrote (18631)4/27/1999 2:42:00 PM
From: maintenance  Respond to of 26850
 
Actually the following statement is false:

"...where a written contract is in place and signed
by both parties it will superceed what anyone claims
they thought other party said."sic

If for example when purchasing an insurance policy, the agent tells you that your are covered for B and the signed written policy does not cover B, you are covered. Proving the verbal part is a challenge though.

Cheers



To: Gord Bolton who wrote (18631)4/27/1999 3:23:00 PM
From: Lorne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Gord - You've made so many false statements about the law that I must conclude that you're just making it up. A verbal deal can and often does nullify a prior contract. It does matter what the two parties thought they were signing. Intent is everything. And the Supreme Court doesn't hear cases such as this.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News