SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Naggrachi who wrote (9447)4/27/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: David Harker  Respond to of 10072
 
Life is sweet!




To: Naggrachi who wrote (9447)4/27/1999 3:35:00 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
Zead, from the article >>Ultimately, Sony won't have the HiFD drive on the market until almost two years after its introduction. And some wonder if it will be too late to slow Iomega's momentum.<<

HiFD was DOA, it's too late now.

G.



To: Naggrachi who wrote (9447)4/27/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: Dale Stempson  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 10072
 
Today's confirmation of the seriously extended delay in the relaunch of Sony's drive is certainly good news IMO.

(Sony's Leal said: "The modifications needed to improve product reliability haven't been completed, so a relaunch of the product isn't expected until this fall, at earliest.")

In the mean time, I expect we will likely see the Zip installed base continue significant unit growth allowing for decreased manufacturing costs. The Zip 250 should be able to firmly establish itself by fall.

I guess the bottom line is that Iomega management has been allowed some extra time to focus on key issues (such as reducing costs) instead of being forced into pricing action with a new competitor.

It is interesting to me that Sony continues to see a lot of potential in the removable market and has not thrown in the towel now that Zip has such a huge headstart.

Now, how 'bout we see some press from the legal department in Roy regarding the SyQuest court case pending against Castlewood.

Regards - Dale