SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (36801)4/27/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: HammerHead  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 86076
 

Mr Green gives green light to hype, so we will see DOW 12000 soon.

biz.yahoo.com



To: Lucretius who wrote (36801)4/27/1999 7:51:00 PM
From: Bonnie Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
looks like the nasdaq advance-decline line



To: Lucretius who wrote (36801)4/27/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: wlheatmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
<<good grief! what is going on w/ this... I've never seen a divergence like this... are we gonna blastoff to even sillier leels or is Joe 6P finally going to get his head served up to him?>>

i don't know if these are good indicators...but seems more and more of my friends believe that the market will just keep going up and despite the occasional dip, we're going up....heck, yesterday, a good buddy of mine from Corpus called and wanted to know what i thought of the Munder Net Net fund.....UFB....this very intelligent guy has been about as astute and in tune with the market as the next refugee from Kosovo and out of the blue, he wants to know if the damned net fund is a good place to park money for the next 15 years....i said, sure, if you don't mind leaving it parked for a long time....like until they invent the intergalacticnet fund.....the world is coming to an end....damn that Nostradamus assssssshole.....



To: Lucretius who wrote (36801)4/27/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
This chart does not look right. I am not competent to say what it means, but it just looks extreme.