SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (44105)4/27/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Don't be a goof. Oops, too late...



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (44105)4/27/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
HORROR HIGH: THERE ARE QUICK FIXES
By DICK MORRIS

ALL that we hear in the aftermath of the Littleton,
Colo., school massacre is that we need to revisit
what triggers teen violence and reassess how we
raise our children. Colorado Education
Commissioner William J. Maloney, for example,
said on the Fox News Channel that ''there are no
quick fixes.''

There are.

Those guns and those bombs could not have
made it through the front door of that high school
if an armed guard with a metal detector were
standing there screening students as they went in.
How could two shotguns, two handguns, and
thirty bombs have passed, unnoticed through a
detector?

To say that the issue in promoting safety in
schools is to migrate the teen propensity toward
violence is like saying that we have to lower the
level of anger and criminality on the planet to
make our airplanes safe. No. We just made the
passengers go through metal detectors and
everything was fine.

In a statement that defied credibility, Dr. Moloney
said that ''schools aren't like airplanes. There are
multiple entrances and once a plane goes up, you
don't have to worry about it, but you have to
monitor a school all day.'' Somehow, the problem
of securing access to a school building does not
seem too daunting to challenge the ingenuity of the
human race. We secure courthouses, White
Houses, and statehouses. We can secure schools.

We are witnessing a coalition of the crazy left and
the crazy right, bolstered by a president who lacks
the guts to say what he thinks.

The left doesn't want us to make ''school into
prisons.'' They would rather risk the lives of our
students than to compromise their idyllic,
imaginary, palaces of learning with something so
crass as a metal detector. Not for them to worry
that kids are afraid to go to school and that 13
innocents died in a hail of gunfire. The aesthetics
matter so very much more to their sensitive souls.

The right is scared to death that somebody will
actually propose that we limit guns and bombs.
They worry that Americans will no longer ignore
the fact that if the NRA didn't kill efforts to limit
these weapons of death and destruction, they
would not find their way into our schools. For the
right wing, metal detectors are the first step in
blaming the hardware. First metal detectors and
then, who knows what? Their message: Clean up
your movies, but don't take away the guns and
bombs.

Amidst it all are Bill Clinton and Janet Reno
espousing an end to violence and confrontation,
blaming the culture and calling for making gentle
the ways of man. Of course they are right, but
how about metal detectors? Neither Reno nor
Clinton have the guts or the political capital to
violate the shibboleths of the left and the right. Bill
Clinton knows damn well that metal detectors are
the answer and he supports putting them in
schools. So why the silence? Not because of a
lack of knowledge, but a shortfall of courage. The
usual problem.

In 1996, he and I discussed allocating money
from the Safe and Drug Free School Act be
allocated to states for guards and for metal
detectors. He supported the idea and asked me to
figure out how much it would cost to provide
every high school in the nation with a cop and
metal detectors. He has always backed the
principle. He just isn't talking about it these days,
which is too bad for the kids who will die in the
next copycat massacre.

Attorney General Janet Reno also turned away
from suggestions that parental liability be tightened
in situations such as these. Are not parents who
permit their minor children to hoard weapons -
and who ignore other signs of a propensity to
violence - responsible for the acts of their
children?

And while we are at it, what about the school
system itself? There were warnings. One of the
Trench Coat Mafia killed his father in 1997 and
then committed suicide. Is it not too far a stretch
to realize that it would be wise to beef up security
in the school where his confederates are still in
attendance?

Part of the problem is that expulsion from public
school is about as easy as firing a tenured teacher.
States have no place to put students who don't
belong in the normal school environment.
Tennessee Gov. Don Sundquist has pioneered an
unusual and important answer to this problem by
helping to create a school in each district
specifically for kids who have been expelled from
the regular system. These behavior problems and
violent threats get special help and attention in
these schools and do not place the other students
throughout the system at risk.

Interestingly, the data about the students thus
diverted to alternate schools is very encouraging.
They have higher graduation rates and lower
incidences of violence in school than did similar
students before these alternate schools were
developed.

Obviously, Hollywood must do its part to reduce
the images of violence. Certainly, we need
counseling and better early warning of the
potential for student violence. But the ''quick
fixes'' here are likely to work well ... and quickly!
Metal detectors, alternate schools for the violent
and disruptive, stricter parental liability and
enforcement of school-system liability will all act
to reduce the potential for more mass and
sickening slaughter.

These days its getting harder to distinguish
Kosovo from our schools.