To: bill who wrote (32677 ) 4/28/1999 7:30:00 AM From: Zardoz Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116759
For your approval Searle, Jim, Goldsnow & Bill: " I was gratified to see that some members of this thread believe that the real rate of inflation is not being reported. For some time now I've been telling ad naseum to all who would listen that the reported inflation rate is being manipulated." #reply-8772586 techstocks.com I've wouldn't subscribe to the word manipulation, but more to being incorrectly interpreted. As you can see I suspect that real inflation rate is around 6.25%. I, being a monetarist, believe that the FED can and does control inflation/deflation by the use of instruments such as M2/M3... And Investor-ex! came up with much the same number, using dissimilar analysis. As Morgy points out indirectly, a person can look at the price inflation of homes to see that USA is/has been in a inflation economy for a long while. Yes, the US dollar is loosing purchasing power {cost of homes in Washington State was reported on TV the other day as up 20%+ yr/yr. So if inflation is so high, then why doesn't the CPI reflect this.} Too many consider that CPI is an inflation index... it's not. stats.bls.gov :80/sahome.htmlstats.bls.gov :80/cpifaq.htm Just as there is more then 1 way to measure inflation, there is more then 1 way to measure deflation. "Is the CPI a cost-of-living index? No, although it frequently and mistakenly is called a cost-of-living index. The CPI is an index of price change only. It does not reflect the changes in buying or consumption patterns that consumers probably would make to adjust to relative price changes." Want to buy a Japanese car over an American? If you are to continue to read on further you'd see that the CPI does not take into account lower prices due to fluctuation of currencies. So in affect a lower YEN {120 as oppose to 90} can cause a lower CPI by creating a lower price for base products. It neglects deflation due to substitution. Even from the FED's own site: "Various techniques have been devised to measure different aspects of inflation. The CPI measures inflation as experienced by consumers in their day-to-day living expenses; the Producer Price Index (PPI) captures it at earlier stages of the production and marketing process... and the Gross Domestic Product Deflator (GDP-Deflator) measures combine the experience with inflation of governments Federal, State and local), businesses, and consumers. " Finally, if we assume that inflation and deflation are opposites, as many would have you believe, and that GOLD is that absolute store of value; then: Note (1): "...inflation erodes consumers' purchasing power" "...deflation increases consumer purchasing power" Would this not mean gold would buy you more in deflation? After all the US dollar is a fiat currency? But gold has decreased in value, AKA inflation. So GOLD does best in Deflation. An example is the Euro/Oz of gold, if Germany was nearing a recession, then the POG in Euros should shoot up, and from last summer it has. {I'll ommitt the pound for an obvious reason.} Note deflation is NOT the opposite of inflation. Any time you have an increasing purchasing power, you have deflation. CPI can go up, and still have deflation (see: GDP-Deflator). So you agree up till here? No... but it is possible for prices not to change while your gross domestic product gets eroded. So how does the Gross Domestic Product Defaltor effect the CPI? Could the CPI index {inflation} relative to the remaining world actually be deflated; and a 1.5% CPI value may actually be 4-5% true inflation? People may live in USA, but many of their products are coming from elsewhere. Have we not seen the trade deficit increase in USA over the preceding years? So it is possible that CPI can be held down by substitution of foreign products. And this has been holding the CPI numbers lower then what they truly are. Exporting inflation, importing dis-inflation to offset inflation's rise. Now if CPI is an index of price change only, then is not a 1.5% CPI and an decreasing domestic product rate a possible sign of strong deflation. And how does an increasing trade deficit, effect that? "...deflation increases consumer purchasing power".. We'd probably call it a recession? So how about the opposite: A low CPI number, and a increasing Domestic Product as a sign of inflation? " inflation decreases consumer purchasing power" You might suggest that it's dis-inflation. But dis-inflation is only a change from CPI inflation to less. You can remove dis-inflation, and re-inflation and call them for what they are {See note #1 above}. Otherwise, for gold BULLS {whom believe that gold does best in inflation}, the price of GOLD would always continue upwards, as CPI inflation is nearly always positive. So without consideration of other monetary aspects, they CAN'T form a justified baseline. CPI is insufficient for analysis of GOLD alone. Depression are caused by excessive deflation, but deflation has NEVER been negative inflation. In the great depression domestic output fell at the same time as price changes fell {CPI}. This is why we call it a depression. bonds rate = real return + CPI inflation if the 30 years are 5.55%, CPI = 1.5%, then real return would be 4.05% This is the near the target range for the US fed {4.25% real return). But the US Fed uses monetary aggregate to control the economy. So when you look at M2/M3 as I suggest so many times, then you come up with monetary inflation which can/does hide CPI inflation. This is why CPI is meaningless. Even GNP or GDP are better index's for the economy, and measures of inflation. william-king.www.drexel.edu "However, if you need to estimate the purchasing power of the dollar for all sorts of goods and services, including investment goods, the consumer price index doesn't do that, and the Gross Domestic Product Deflator is probably your best choice." Here's what you should consider:quicken.excite.com