Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (56632)	4/28/1999 7:51:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575765

Paul - RE: "How many hundreds of posts echoed this same thought concerning Intel, their Pentium II and Celeron and Pentium III pricing strategy? Have you seen Intel's profits diminish since their Celerons were introduced - even as they ramped the Celeron from 233 MHz to 466 MHz?" There is a difference when comparing Celeron pricing and their result, which you are doing, and high-MHz chips potential pricing, which I am doing. I am asking how will Intel price its high-MHz chips, the ones it gets its profits from, if AMD makes a limited quantity of the same MHz chips. This does pose a small dilemma for Intel, if the situation ever tapes out. After reading the rest of the posts here, it seems like you have had a change of heart w/AMD. Do you also plan to get in (I got some more yesterday)?