SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:06:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com  Respond to of 44908
 
Message 7139601

To: Eagle (14167 )
From: The Swordsman Wednesday, Jan 6 1999 9:30PM ET
Reply # of 26471

Probably because I'm doing a project for a CCI prospect. And
they like the idea, and it may be a green light. No guarantee, but
looks good.

And please no questions, and no I cannot tell who or how big, but
wow! That's how I got here to begin with.

sword

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Message 7530157

To: Bald Eagle (15907 )
From: The Swordsman Thursday, Jan 28 1999 10:50AM ET
Reply # of 26490

Instinct tells me that the PP will probably cause dilution but if the
company continues to execute as it has, I think we'll see revenue at
the bottom line this quarter and much more as time progress's.

While I don't want to diminish its importance (the PP), God knows
how hard I hammered on the subject last week, I believe that it
will be a fact of life but not so that we won't reach our destination.
Profitability.

As I have once said I have a large client that is in the proposal
mode and it looks like it will happen. The dollars are too large
to comprehend. They have shut me down so I have to live with
snipets from lower level people.

sword



To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com  Respond to of 44908
 
Still waiting Sword. What are you afraid of?

"And I'll always reserve the right to
change my mind as the information changes."

Or lie, as once stated by you before. Whichever does you the most
good, right? Oh, by the way, are you running from my question, or
do you not want to discuss your past affiliations? Again, I ask.
What is your past affiliation with CCI and Darrel Piercy? I PM'd
you my phone number, either call me or send me your phone
number so I can call you. What's the problem Sword? Sounds like
you have something to hide.

V$gas.Com



To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:21:00 AM
From: ztect  Respond to of 44908
 
Message 7071810

To: KIPPer (13803 )
From: The Swordsman Saturday, Jan 2 1999 11:41AM ET
Reply # of 26466

Mostly lurking, but I don't believe that SI will do anything about....[Sword's] neagative postings. Quite frankly his posts are actual excerpts from the 10K and worthwhile to read.

However, I do agree that the repetitiveness with which he posts the same info tells us where he's coming from.
The only defense against this kind of poster would appear to me to be continued pressure upon him to call the company, get the answers and then post here. If he doesn't do it then maybe someone should.


Further, I would say that after 4 or 5 repetitive posts in the same few hours a complaint could then be lodged with SI for their consideration. It would be an harassment issue.

Sword



To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:22:00 AM
From: ztect  Respond to of 44908
 
Message 7139601

To: Eagle (14167 )
From: The Swordsman Wednesday, Jan 6 1999 9:30PM ET
Reply # of 26471

Probably because I'm doing a project for a CCI prospect. And they like the idea, and it may be a green light. No guarantee, but looks good.

And please no questions, and no I cannot tell who or how big, but
wow! That's how I got here to begin with.

sword

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Message 7530157

To: Bald Eagle (15907 )
From: The Swordsman Thursday, Jan 28 1999 10:50AM ET
Reply # of 26490

Instinct tells me that the PP will probably cause dilution but if the company continues to execute as it has, I think we'll see revenue at the bottom line this quarter and much more as time progress's.

While I don't want to diminish its importance (the PP), God knows how hard I hammered on the subject last week, I believe that it will be a fact of life but not so that we won't reach our destination. Profitability.

As I have once said I have a large client that is in the proposal mode and it looks like it will happen. The dollars are too large to comprehend. They have shut me down so I have to live with snipets from lower level people.

sword



To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:23:00 AM
From: ztect  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
Member 4966547

To: Robert B. (13814 )
From: The Swordsman Saturday, Jan 2 1999 2:29PM ET
Reply # of 26943

Good questions. I'd like to know those answers.

None of course that Mr. ...[Sword] will probably wish to dig for much less post answers for, given the fact that he is one of those known to the investment world as momo traders.

He's actually a bit worse because his goal is merely to deceptively scare the unsuspecting into selling the price down lower for his own selfish goals. Not as he won't buy shares, because after all he will buy shares, but he wants some poor schmo to sell lower based upon the fear his very unbalanced posts produce.

In that lies the very great difference between the daytrader and the long term investor. The longtermer wishes to add value and the daytrader merely wishes to line his/her own pockets at the expense of all concerned but themselves.

I think the most interesting aspect of all this is that people like ....[Sword] really believe that they have done nothing wrong in the manipulation of negative information, and let's face it there is an abundance of it with tsig.
There is also another side to this seamy picture that almost induces praise for Mr.....[Sword's] obviousness. He is what he is and makes no bones about it. There is another form of life out here that is the lowest of low. And that is the hypster who is selling into the hype and upward movement of the price, all along appearing to be a long termer. Very difficult to figure out who is who, but at least we know Mr..... [Sword's] motives.

Sword



To: The Swordsman who wrote (27002)4/28/1999 10:54:00 AM
From: Ellen  Respond to of 44908
 
I'll try to keep this question infront of the thread until someone has an answer besides the obvious.

Please spare us. Beating the thread up with it serves no purpose.

Meanwhile, I still haven't gotten your answer to the very serious question that I posed in that post. It was not rhetorical.

Then please return to the subject when you have a non-rhetorical answer.

TIA