Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thebeaver1 who wrote (17408)	4/28/1999 10:53:00 AM
From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.	Respond to of 40688

PNL's approach IMO has the best bang for the buck in increasing value, only a matter of time for it to be realized in stock price.

To: thebeaver1 who wrote (17408)	4/28/1999 11:11:00 AM
From: James Simonick	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 40688

Don't think you're out in left field - remember this is a pioneering venture. Remember when it was uncertain if IBM, Apple, Commodore etc., were going to take the pie as the leaders in PC hardware platform structure? We know what has happened now, but the same dynamics apply here. The inventors or designers have to create a model that they think best fits the requirements and market both now and in the future. It takes a lot of vision and work to pull something like this off, and in the beginning there are really no established road signs to help. For this reason I see the diversity as being the naturally greatest probability of occurrence, with the common features that emerge probably being the only 'sure' requirements that all players recognize. BTW, marketing was the key to success for the IBM structure, as better performance machines with multitasking capabilities were available over 10 years ago now. -Jim