SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NickSE who wrote (37063)4/28/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: Oblomov  Respond to of 86076
 
How does she know that models that produce results contrary to hers
are "poor" forecasting models? Is she referring to the historical
accuracy of these models, or to their presumed future accuracy? If
the latter is the case, why couldn't she simply state that the models are incomplete? Or is she unaware of the difference between a priori
and a posteriori reasoning?

AA



To: NickSE who wrote (37063)4/28/1999 8:02:00 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
if this is fair value.. I shutter to think about what "overvalued" would look like...



To: NickSE who wrote (37063)4/28/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: TheStockFairy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86076
 
Sh*t, that bit*h is just riding the wave. She can keep saying that until she is wrong, and up till now, she hasn't been wrong. All the power to that skees bag.

edit: how come bit*h shows up in the spell correction, but sh*t doesn't?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News