Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Black-Scholes who wrote (40274)	4/28/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: DiViT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

"Why would anyone think CUBE's advance would "falter"? CUBE is not overvalued. CUBE is not riding a wave of optimism. CUBE's sentiment is luke warm at best. And yet CUBE sells into the same market that BRCM is valued so highly for selling to. Think about it. " Uh, I thought you've been following this stock for years? History is why everyone thinks CUBE's advance will "falter". BTW: Herb Greenberg hasn't been with the San Francisco Chronicle or Examiner for some time now.

To: Black-Scholes who wrote (40274)	4/28/1999 6:50:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Respond to of 50808

The idea that Herb Greenberg "talked Cube down" has been pretty much discredited. Cube tripped over its own shoelaces when its own wild-*** predictions for VCD and SVCD and DVD decoder supergrowth were systematically dismantled. The mkt took care of itself. Herb Greenberg is now at thestreet.com, rubbing shoulders with Mr. Cramer, that bad boy. <gg> Greenberg pretty much ignored the CUBEr once it bottomed in mid-98. Then the stock had one of those Lucy runs to $30, and the collective sphincter of the old longs unclenched, only to be brutally body cavity searched by the fickle finger of mo-mo traders this Jan. But hey - this time's different™ :-)