Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (5788)	4/28/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Stormweaver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

>> As for inflicted harm, I should say that heavy damage to men >> under arms, say a casualty rate of 50% and a fatality rate of >> 25-33% Okay taking the conservative estimate of 200,000 troops it would be acceptable then for between 50-65000 dead NATO soldiers ? That was a brave statement Neo but I don't think the public (especially in the states) would put up with that. Even 5% casualties, 10,000 dead would be enough to start a riot in Washington. I agree though this thing should never have become a military campaign. Get the Russians to agree to some contract, and then present it to Milosevic. He'll have to sign once his Ace is gone.