Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (44381)	4/28/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Neo- Off to do some reading before bed. You know I have often thought that you could make a million bucks opening an optometrist/eyeglass shop next to every law school in the US. Franchise that sucker and make a bundle. <ggg> JLA

To: Neocon who wrote (44381)	4/28/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I await elaboration...>> Achem...I object to the phrase "otherwise objectionable." It can mean whatever anybody wants it to. When I saw it in the rules I figured I would use it on everybody. Starting with people who knew I couldn't possibly have anything serious against them. Now on the one hand, I think if someone takes offense by something that I've said or done and they confront me on it. Well, I have to ask, was I standing on principle and the person didn't like it? Maybe because they are champions of the unprincipled life. If so, tough. I will hold my ground. On the other hand was I just being rude to get attention? Maybe I thought it was a joke. If the jokee didn't like it, apology time. Hmmm...sorry jla...sorry ish.