SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carl R. who wrote (29795)4/29/1999 12:02:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Respond to of 70976
 
Thanks for the clarification.

In the US, TI got out of the DRAM business. In Italy, there was another company that got out (I can't remember), in Japan, Hitachi and Toshiba, have plans to get out (I think there are more companies, but I don't know their names), in Taiwan a number of small DRAM makers have started to move to make logic instead of DRAM (though I doubt that they can pull it off), in Korea Samsung bought (merged) Hyundai's operations (it is unlikely that they will run it at full tilt while they are losing money). All in all I'd say that there have been substantial changes to the landscape. The survivors are in pretty bad shapes themself. This is evident by looking at MU and Samsung (I wish I could trade it) who are the number 1 and 2 producers in terms of volume and effeciency. When the generals are bleeding, the soldiers must be dying.

As for AMAT's valuations, the range that I gave was specific to AMAT; I was not commenting on the general industry. I think once AMAT traded above 4.5 times forward revenue. But such hights are short lived. Don't get me wrong, AMAT is a great company and if you buy it here, chances are that you'll be making money in 3 years. But I am suspicious of its short term performance.

Sun Tzu

P.S. A while back I posted the historical valuations and sales growth of AMAT over the past 10 years. It may be a good idea to look at that post again and watch the chart for the corresponding periods.



To: Carl R. who wrote (29795)4/29/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Rob C.  Respond to of 70976
 
Carl,

I also thought 50 would hold...as long as it closes above 50 I imagine it will recover rather smartly.

Regards,

Rob