Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Labor Ready (LRW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Berg who wrote (72)	4/29/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Khris Vogel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 379

Guys, be forewarned. Some idiot named Larry Abrams is trying to get Mr. Pink and his thread all worked up over LRW again. FWIW, I think LRW mgmt. is probably going to be a little less tolerant of false rumors (and those who created them) going forward than they may have been in the past.

To: Jim Berg who wrote (72)	4/30/1999 10:40:00 PM
From: Thomas Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 379

I have a question about these 3:2 splits? I understand that they do it to keep the stock affordable to more investors. Why, however, do they continue to do them 3:2? I'll actually have half shares if they do another 3:2. Granted, I can't complain about the stock going up in value ten times since I bought two years ago, but do they have to continue doing these annoying 3:2 splits. I'd be a lot happier if they wait for a 2 for 1, then at least I'd have multiples of 50 shares.