SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LaFayette555 who wrote (18750)4/29/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: teevee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Bird Brain,
Reading between the lines, yes the dips gently rotate around the axis.....it is beginning to look more like a lopolith(also bowl or cone shaped but could DRAMATICALLY thicken towards the feeder area)....the potential tonnage implications are now much larger than I anticipated......who would have thought!!!!
regards,
teevee



To: LaFayette555 who wrote (18750)4/29/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: Sam  Respond to of 26850
 
When these guys start looking over the fence and telling you the grass might be better over there,,,shits
MR RT Better come up with something better than
whoops ,I have to take that back as I only got half of the news release,got to read it again
sam



To: LaFayette555 who wrote (18750)4/29/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: chummer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
As usual,you have trouble understanding the English language.
The NR says noting of the sort,it simply says that more info is needed.
Again,you are distorting the truth.
Your prediction yesterday that the stock would crater today failed to materialize.

You are up to no good,if you don't like the stock...don't buy it!!



To: LaFayette555 who wrote (18750)4/29/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
I think that what they say is that they have not done enough drilling to prove or disprove the cone sheet theory. What they have done is prove up some significant tonnage which is the primary objective.
Dyke thins to south and west but is wide open to north and east.
If you go to the Winspear web site and read some of the analysts reports from last spring there is some interesting comments on the dyke intersections on the east shore.
The anyalist says that they intersected another dyke which seems to dip away to the north-east.
It might be a long time before the entire puzzle is solved from an academic perspective. From an economic persepctive:
10 million tonnes X 1.5 carats per tonne X $300.00 U.S.= $4,500,000,000.00 U.S.