By: PCModem
Reply To: 8118 by rhinoinchgo Thursday, 29 Apr 1999 at 4:32 PM EDT
Post # of 8141
**OT** The Janice Shell Conspiracy Revealed (a blast from the past)
Sorry to intrude! I thought you might be interested in some of this. I'm not a shareholder in your company and know nothing about it good or bad, but I do know something about Ms. Shell as you can see from what follows:
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: None Monday, 12 Oct 1998 at 3:17 PM EDT
Post # of 26726
The Shell Conspiracy Revealed!!!
From the Fortune Article:
pathfinder.com
"Shell has been accused of being an underhanded broker, a short-seller...and a whole lot worse. ("Well, Miss Janice, protector of the small investor," reads one typically creepy Silicon Investor posting, "you must be very tired of being the north end of a south bound donkey, a.k.a. horse's a**.") She's even received death threats. But Shell isn't fazed--she's far too busy defending her fellow investors, whether they like it or not. "There are a bunch of psychos out there--I'm not exaggerating--each one weirder than the next," she warns. "
Now she is claiming to be protecting her "FELLOW INVESTORS" [emphasis added]:
"--she's far too busy defending her fellow investors, whether they like it or not."
Shell is claiming to be a PRWT shareholder!!!
When will the lies stop? When will the fakery stop? When will the conspiracy stop? When will defrauding the REAL investors stop???
GO PRWT!!!
I'm Proudly:
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- long; ST Rating- buy; LT Rating- buy)
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2333 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 9:48 AM EDT
Post # of 26729
"fellow investors" means fellow investors, it does not have a "general sense" meaning. It means what it says.
You have been caught in a lie, published in a national magazine, you did not retract it nor done anything to correct the lie until I pointed it out to the world. Too late now.
You misrepresented the facts about yourself just as you have consistently misrepresented the facts to thousands of shareholders about their investments and consequently deprived them of any gain their investments might have realized if you had not lied to them.
What kind of assets do you have? Are they here in the U.S., or in Italy, or both? Can you afford to pay back the people you have hurt? How does a class action law suit sound? You want to be a REAL celebrity? You are about to get your wish!
GO PRWT!!!
ragingbull.com
By: JaniceShell
Reply To: 2334 by PCModem Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 10:02 AM EDT
Post # of 26733
>>
Kindly point out where I'm quoted as saying I own, or ever have owned, any of these stocks. Planning on joining Rosy in his class action attempt. That'll make two of you.
As I asked once before: what's the class? People who blame others when their stock tanks? By the way, are you saying that it's somehow my fault that MTEI turned out to be a scam?
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2335 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 10:58 AM EDT
Post # of 26733
The class would be the people you purport to be a member of but are not: "fellow investors" as quoted in fortune magazine, which you allowed to incorrectly continue to identify you as a "fellow investor" until I pointed it out.
That's the lie you allowed to be told (at minimum) and certainly lead the people at Fortune to believe to be true when you did not insist on a correction, and did not publicly post a correction here or on SI.
That's the class: "fellow investors" all the rest of us. Everyone who you have ever posted to. Everyone who has ever read your posts. That's the class. I'm not surprised you don't recognize the term or its meaning since you seem to have none yourself.
You and your cadre have SUCH difficulty with definitions don't you -- words like GUARANTEE, FELLOW INVESTOR and CLASS are beyond you.
Lets put MTEI to rest: That company was a scam before you came along. It was on its way to being revealed as a scam before you came along. Nothing you did saved any investor any money, and nothing you are doing is helping any of them get their money back. It does not take any skill at all to throw a buch of crap against the way and have some of it stick. HOW DARE YOU TAKE CREDIT FOR MTEI!!! The SEC stopped MTEI, not you. I've been in touch with several MTEI investors. I have been helping them behind the scenes. What have you done to assist them? NOTHING. Your method makes it IMPOSSIBLE for you to do any GOOD. You are so obnoxious, nasty, snotty and generally unpleasant that NO ONE pays any attention to what you say. They pay attention to the NOISE not the MESSAGE. You delude yourself thinking that you are HELPING when all you are doing is HURTING.
If you want to help, which I STRONLY doubt. Why not do it in a helpful way? Why not do some DD, find some facts and post them?
Why not go Legit?
Ah, but then you'd have to change your self-image. Your whole reason for being would have to be altered. You'd have to WORK and PROVE what you now just insinuate.
What are your assets? How much are you worth? Investors who have lost lots of money want to know!!!!!
GO PRWT!!!
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- long; ST Rating- buy; LT Rating- buy)
ragingbull.com
By: JaniceShell
Reply To: 2341 by PCModem Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 11:21 AM EDT
Post # of 26737
>>
I suggest you ask Raven Crazy about that.
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2346 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 12:00 PM EDT
Post # of 26736
"I suggest you ask Raven Crazy about that. "
But I asked you. You should answer.
Oh, I forgot! I'm the one who points out to everyone when you allow lies about you to be published in a national magazine and do nothing to correct the lie.
That explains it, doesn't it?
And STILL you have nothing to contribute to anyone's KNOWLEDGE about PRWT. With SO MANY actual scams out there one would think that you'd find some socially redeeming way to occupy yourself given your recent exposure.
But that would be the resonable thing to expect of someone who genuinely wanted to help investors. I don't know WHAT came over me, I forgot who I was dealing with. Nevermind.
GO PRWT!!!
ragingbull.com
By: JaniceShell
Reply To: 2348 by PCModem Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 12:04 PM EDT
Post # of 26738
This is really very interesting. YOU'RE the one who's made something up, and are doing your very best to say it often enough that people will begin to believe it's true.
Let's try this once more: I am indeed part of the larger "investment community", in the sense that I have investments. Neither I nor the Fortune reporter said or implied that I owned any of the stocks in question.
You're pissed off, maybe jealous?, and you're grasping at straws. You're also making a fool of yourself.
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2351 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 12:18 PM EDT
Post # of 26739
Lets examine this carefully:
From the Fortune Article:
pathfinder.com
"Shell has been accused of being an underhanded broker, a short-seller...and a whole lot worse. ("Well, Miss Janice, protector of the small investor," reads one typically creepy Silicon Investor posting, "you must be very tired of being the north end of a south bound donkey, a.k.a. horse's a**.") She's even received death threats. But Shell isn't fazed--she's far too busy defending her fellow investors, whether they like it or not. "There are a bunch of psychos out there--I'm not exaggerating--each one weirder than the next," she warns. "
Well, lets see. What does it say? "...she's far too busy defending her fellow investors, whether they like it or not."
If I'm grasping at straws, looks like I nailed a whole handfull.
"...and all the kings horses and all the kings men couldn't...." Well, you know the rest.
Jealous? Of what? Of being utterly UNABLE to support with anything approaching a FACT any of your accusations, innuendos and insinuations? Jealous of hurting so many investors? Jealous of the nationally published lie being exposed? Jealous??? Of being an art historian who spends 12 hours a day doing NOTHING connected with your vocation? Jealous of having NOTHING of substance to contribute to the discussion of PRWT?
ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND?
Oh, but I forgot. You are deluded. You think your are a "Queen" a label that was published by the same people who believe you are helping your FELLOW INVESTORS, which you aren't--you aren't helping and you aren't a fellow investor.
Now, tell me again how I made up the Fortune Article? I don't seem to follow you there...
GO PRWT!!!
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2351 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 12:36 PM EDT
Post # of 26742
I Just LOVE it!
"This is really very interesting. YOU'RE the one who's made something up, and are doing your very best to say it often enough that people will begin to believe it's true. "
How so VERY curious of YOU to bring THAT up. I'm referring of course to the concept of repeating something "often enough that people will begin to believe it's true."
A little something from YOUR bag of tricks. No wonder it is the FIRST thing you thought of accusing me of doing, even though I did not write the Fortune Article.
Why not spend your time TREATING us to FACTS instead of TRICKING everyone with suggestions, innuendos, insuations which have no basis in FACT and, in the case of nationally published articles, outright lies.
Come on, I bet even YOU could do it if you tried. To be honest I'd much rather be though of as the person who reformed you than the one exposed, discredited and made a laughing stock out of you. I'll even go so far as to bet that you really could accomplish some good on every thread you visted instead of all the damage you cause. Well, we'll see.
GO PRWT!!!
ragingbull.com
By: JaniceShell
Reply To: 2363 by missymay Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 2:20 PM EDT
Post # of 26748
>>
Ah, but I get hooked on the STORIES. Amazing stuff! CSHK, CYGS, MTEI, AZNT, all absolutely fascinating. What a cast of characters! Incredible plot line! I just want to know what's really going on, and how it comes out in the end.
I--and others like me--am aware that there are people who don't understand this. I'm a research scholar by profession, and trying to get to the bottom of things appeals to me.
I must say also that I've met--at least in the cyber and telephone sense--quite a few extremely interesting people over the last six months or so. And I've learned a lot about a great many things. Stevia. Coal mining. Kitty litter. Frozen babies.
ragingbull.com
By: PCModem
Reply To: 2372 by JaniceShell Tuesday, 13 Oct 1998 at 2:39 PM EDT
Post # of 26750
"..I get hooked on the STORIES."
You underestimate us (again). We all understand PERFECTLY your addiction to telling stories -- as you put it, you are indeed HOOKED.
We have read some of them in national magazines. And the rest we have read on the threads where you post them. Very clever stories, too, I must admit that! Stories that are told by asking questions. Leading questions, to which there are no answers, or if there are answers, then they are not accepted.
How insulting of you to suggest we do not understand your addiction.
But we do understand it. Stories. The more "made up" the better. I can see how an art historian, forced to deal with historical fact all day at work, would be attracted to the seduction of telling stories.
And like all addictions -- remember you yourself said you are HOOKED -- after a while the quick fix on SI wasn't enough. Telling stories about real companies didn't quite make it anymore, so you and your friends made up your own company. Then, that too began to fail to satisfy. The national media! An article in a national magazine! A new forum to tell more stories!
Your claim to be here for the story does not match the "story" you told the magazine about why you are here does it? OOPS!
CAUGHT! Now, that's two stories EXPOSED in one day! First your claim to be a FELLOW INVESTOR, then your claim to be here for the STORY and not as a vigilante as in the article. You don't want to "know what's really going on" at all, do you? No. If you did you would do some DD and post your results. Well, but that's work in the real world, like your profession. Not the fun make believe world of STORIES that you are HOOKED ON.
too bad.
GO PRWT!!!
After October 13, 1999 (a rather unpleasant, if not unlucky, day for Ms. Shell) she stayed off RB for 90 days. Here's proof:
ragingbull.com
|
