Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Syncrude who wrote (12009)	4/29/1999 8:48:00 PM
From: slave	Respond to of 25548

I was a very very very large investor in KRY .As i am sure you are familiar.Balanced posts are very important to all that read them.I am just trying to let everyone know that you cannot believe everything you read on these threads, be it positive or negative.We have came from .07 to over .50 in a short time, that at least should give people a reason to look at this company with a open mind to decide where we may go from here.........That is my opinion.....Dave

To: Syncrude who wrote (12009)	4/29/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

Syncrude, you have somewhat a valid point. Many of the long term posters here have been bashed hundreds of times over the last year. "Don't tread on me!" is our motto. Quite a number of posters have done an incredible amount of DD on Medinah and tire of explaining all the details needed to understand the play. We are convinced where Medinah is headed. Balanced to you seems like bashing to us. Sorry if you are getting left out in the cold. You are right, Medinah is no ARP. IMO,Medinah has at least 1 order of magnititude more gold than ARP if you count all of Medinah's holdings. Cheers!

To: Syncrude who wrote (12009)	4/29/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Geoff Coates-Wynn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

If you'll forgive the verbosity, I'll try and answer you, but I think your question deserves more than a quick response. Those familiar with the thread should probably just click 'next' This NPEC/MDIN family has been together for around three years now, and as any small group will do when focused on a common goal, we have grown quite tight. We have endured countless slings and arrows, and we have still managed to survive (which I feel is an argument for the validity of this company in and of itself). We have shared a great deal of information, and we often feel that anyone dropping by should also know the same info. When new faces show up, there tends to be some natural distrust, and when what are likely innocent questions are asked, we will sometimes assume it is another attempt to discredit the company. The company's many projects are in some ways complex, and require more than a "quick look" to even begin to understand. We should expect some fresh faces with any news or price movement, and no doubt much of the interest is genuine, but I think there are definitely those who wish to depress the price and will certainly stoop to such depths as posting negative comments, unsubstantiated, on this thread. Overall, I don't think that questions which have been asked responsibly, with respect for the great amount of effort expended by the regulars in obtaining the answers, have been answered with hostility. Those which seem flippant or seem to have a significant negative bias, are (understandably, given our history) often greeted with defensive answers. People defend that in which they believe. Sometimes this defense is overzealous. Nevertheless, I think most of this thread's regulars truly believe we are headed much higher very quickly. Others must draw their own conclusions. Personally, I hope legitimate questions are dealt with openly, and I hope malicious questions are dealt with ruthlessly. I hope longs make tons of money, and I hope to be drinking lots of beer in Louisiana before all is said and done. Geoff

To: Syncrude who wrote (12009)	4/29/1999 10:10:00 PM
From: Handshake™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

Syncrude as always we welcome both sides to the educational story, but it is obvious what your intentions might be and which side you might be on. So please spare the thread any potential garbage, thank you, Vince

To: Syncrude who wrote (12009)	4/29/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: russn	Respond to of 25548

I wonder about that myself,