SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jach who wrote (30423)4/30/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Hey,Jach...look at MS comments on CSCO...but you know better.



To: jach who wrote (30423)4/30/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: polarisnh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
jach,

While I understand what you are saying about relative valuations I think that you are being a little simplistic in your comparison of P/E ratios. P/E ratios are compiled by using forward earning visibility, consistency, and anticipated growth rates. There are other factors but these are the primary ones that I focus on. Cisco has a historic record of providing excellent forward visibility, consistent analyst guidance, very little in downward surprises, and excellent growth rates. Therefore, the street has rewarded this stock with a high P/E because it is a relatively safe high growth stock that doesn't surprise its shareholders.

3Com has a history inconsistent earnings, hence poor visibility, and misleading future growth. Therefore Wall Street has knocked the tar out of this stock.

Which stock has the potential for higher growth in the next 12 to 18 month time frame? 3Com is obviously if Benhamou can dig his head out of his a**! All Cisco has to do is hiccup (Earnings warning.) and it will be chopped by a 1/3 faster than you can say Palm Pilot since its price is based upon earnings 2 to 3 years out.

IMHO,

Steve



To: jach who wrote (30423)5/3/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: Alex Raytselsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
thanks for misinformation. Now go away...