SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (54235)4/30/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
Sarmad is a very good day trader, but dislikes the nets stocks as companies. Sarmad posts regardless of the changes in direction that blow like the wind through these issues. An honest person.

However, you will now see all the cockroaches who appeared Wednesday afternoon run for the lives. When Amzn dips, they'll be back.



To: Wayners who wrote (54235)4/30/1999 10:19:00 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> Huh? Are you one of the speculators who shorted the open yesterday?

If you're a speculator, why are you citing fundamental stuff like revenue and earnings. You
should be talking technicals instead of trying to instill "fear" in other speculators that do not
use fundamental analysis as a tool.
<<

Perhaps you are thinking of someone else.

A poster asked what did amzn report. I replied "$291 M rev, $60 M loss." That is just the facts. I also added "It is up to you to decide whether this is good or bad". His conclusion was bad.

I learned through expensive lessons that amzn cannot be played according to FA.

Good luck in your investments.



To: Wayners who wrote (54235)4/30/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
You should be talking technicals instead of trying to instill "fear" in other speculators
that do not use fundamental analysis as a tool.


Wayne,

I sure hope you do not use fundamentals. You can't read and understand a 10Q or a 10K.

Glenn