Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nazbuster who wrote (33846)	4/30/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

CYOE Fans, Samir Deeb, and Abdul Deeb, Samir is Abdul's father. Trust Flodyie that his information is correct since his information source had told him it is a fact. Also that Abdul is running the scam behind bars. Look at those large blocks of CYOE that have went through, besides Andreini's that is. Read the story how Southland Communications was manipulated. Amazing comparison. 1997-05-28 -- Stock Manipulation Scheme Yields 7+ Years in Prison Irvine Man Sentenced in Multimillion Dollar Plot to Artificially Increase Stock Value. Case Is Largest of its Type in SoCal. LOS ANGELES, May 28 -- Concluding the largest stock manipulation case ever prosecuted in Southern California, an Irvine man has been sentenced to 87 months in federal prison for running a multimillion dollar scheme that fraudulently manipulated nearly all of his company's publicly traded stock, United States Attorney Nora M. Manella announced today. Ahmad Naim Bayaa, 43, was president and primary shareholder of Southland Communications, a Santa Ana-based pager company. He was convicted last year of 12 felony counts related to a scheme in which the price of Southland Communications stock wasartificially driven up. United States District Judge Richard A. Paez sentenced Bayaa late Tuesday. The defendant was originally scheduled to be sentenced in February, but he failed to appear at a hearing. He was a fugitive for one month until he was taken into custody on suspicion of forgery and passing counterfeit checks. Those charges are currently pending in Orange County Superior Court. At sentencing, Judge Paez increased Bayaa's prison term because the defendant substantially interfered with the business of the court when he knowingly and willfullyfailed to appear. During a two-year conspiracy, Bayaa and codefendant ***Abdul Deeb*** secretly purchased large blocks of Southland Communication stock using the names of other individuals. As the stock value increased, profits were used to purchase additional shares, according to Assistant United States Attorney Barbara Scheper. By March 1990, Bayaa and Deeb had secretly gained control of 88 percent of Southland Communications stock, the prosecutor said. The stock manipulation scheme permitted Bayaa and Deeb to artificially drive up the share price of the stock. In a two-month period in 1990, the price of the stock jumped from $8 a share to $17 a share. Bayaa and Deeb bought Southland Communications stock on margin, with six brokerage houses providing 50 percent of the capital. In April 1990, the Securities and Exchange Commission suspended trading in Southland Communications, a move that rendered the company's stock worthless. The brokerage firms lost $12 million. Additionally, 12 individual investors lost approximately $500,000. Following a jury trial in May 1996, Bayaa was convicted of one count of conspiracy, 10 counts of securities fraud, and one count of money laundering. Deeb, 45, of Anaheim, was convicted of one count of conspiracy, nine counts of securities fraud, and two counts of money laundering. Deeb, a longtime associate of Bayaa who worked at Southland Communications at one time, was sentenced in February to 63 months in federal prison. A third defendant in the case, Shaw Tehrani, a 45-year-old stockbroker from Georgia, previously pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy. He was sentenced to four years in federal prison for his role in the scheme. This case is the product of an extensive investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division, Southern California District. Release No. 97-135 U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Nora M. Manella, United States Attorney312 North Spring Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90012Main Office Number: 213-894-2434 Public Affairs Office: 213-894-6947; fax: 213-894-5377 Thom Mrozek: Public Information Officertmrozek@justice.usdoj.gov Archived News Releases/Documents: usdoj.gov gopher://gopher.usdoj.gov

To: Nazbuster who wrote (33846)	4/30/1999 9:53:00 PM
From: jlib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

<PPOD> Raging Bull: Is Peapod Ripe For Picking? ragingbull.com

To: Nazbuster who wrote (33846)	5/1/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: Regis McConnell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Yes celery is hot. And milk & juice & ice cream, ect... Anthony really should be careful when he calls an emerging growth & concept stock like PPOD "the worst idea I've ever heard". Spending ones time in a small room surrounded by monitors & such promotes, how should I say, a disconnect from the pulse of the 'next great thing'. Like grapes & apples & cheese & bread all delivered to your door thanks to a company such as Peapod, willing to establish a direct order to door customer relationships. ragingbull.com Regis

To: Nazbuster who wrote (33846)	5/1/1999 11:23:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Not long time ago Steve Harmon didn't like PPOD, being "heavy gravity", while zero gravity Internuts are in his favor. I can understand that view, as this appears to be a low-margin and at the same time low-scale biz, compared to PCs as well as CDs/books. The biggest red flag in PPOD is, however, the lack of growth in a time other companies achieved a 100-400% revenue growth. That said, PPOD is up not even 2x since December, while others are up 5x at least. Problem is that it is so cheap (220M Cap, 4x revenues) that another one (AMZN?) can take it out with ease. IS.