SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : GMD RESOURCE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VAUGHN who wrote (904)5/1/1999 3:01:00 PM
From: lloyd lush  Respond to of 1030
 
If you would have been following gmd since feb you would have seen all the trades from many different firm's buying gmd.I would like to say
that i'm from down east but living in yellowknife for seventeen
year's i bought in on the p.p at .25 and bought 47000 more sh on the
open market.Gmd has a good property and i think one of these day's a
major co. will do a j.v on the diamond property [AND MY FEELING IS GMD
WILL HIT $ 3,4,5 AGAIN ]



To: VAUGHN who wrote (904)5/1/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: Dave R. Webb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1030
 
Vaughn

I too am not an expert in kimberlite indicator chemistry, but the results that you were shown shows a more subcalcic and higher chromium pyrope than Diamet has. Diamet's is good chemistry, GMD's is better for published pyrope results.

Regarding the ilmenite chemistry that is published, Diamet has excellent high Mg ilmenites with good chromium distributions. GMD's results that are shown on the same page are more magnesian than Diamet's with an excellent high chromium distribution. Diamet's ilmenites are good, and indicate that diamonds will be found at Ekati....GMD's results are better.

I suppose GMD's results might not be considered spectacular by all, but that they are better than Diamet's published results is reason enough to say that they are very good.

GMD's release policy complies with VSE policy, but doesn't hit the major wire services. This policy may be reviewed in the future.

Dave