SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JustJohn who wrote (947)5/1/1999 1:33:00 AM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3795
 
John, WebNode was described as a private company. I actually missed out on the joke because when I read that I clicked off.

Why would any real investor sell stock to buy on a press release anyway? Perhaps a daytrader might, of course a true daytrader would have been liquid. As it is, the point is moot. Or is that mote?

Barb



To: JustJohn who wrote (947)5/1/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3795
 
John, are you trying to argue that people who read "part of" something and then act in "haste" to buy something that was "non-existant" can sue someone else for their stupidity? The answer is obviously "yes". You can sue someone for anything.

- Jeff



To: JustJohn who wrote (947)5/1/1999 1:45:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 3795
 
John, it would help if you actually looked at the site to see how it was structured. How's a person going to buy a block of XYZ stock when there is no price, no ticker, and clearly says that shares are not currently available for purchase?

In order for your scenario to be true, the person, after knowing that he can't buy any, then goes out and sells his stock, to buy something he already knows he can't buy because it doesn't exist. How often have you ever done that?

How about you go check out the site so as to better inform yourself before asking implausibly improbable questions…



To: JustJohn who wrote (947)5/1/1999 2:37:00 AM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3795
 
Well, wouldn't he have shown himself to be a right twit in doing that.
That's what it's all about - investor credulity.

But you like 'em credulous, doncha.