Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Logpoint Technologies (LGPT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kmac who wrote (597)	5/1/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: Shawn M. Downey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 698

kmac, Since you are PUSHING this little stock on so many discussion groups, I have to wonder if YOU are for real. So I did a quick search on dejanews and found the name "kmac" is associated with the worst kind of spam. www.kmac.com is a company engaged in spamming for clients (mostly porn). This domain is one of the many companies which send unsolicited pornographics email to millions of people hoping a few will respond. There are a lot of people on usenet who are really pissed off at www.kmac.com. So... is this the real you? Of course, you could just fill out your profile and let us all know.... > www.kmac.com/chs/ Registrant: > --------------------------------- > kMac's Shack (KMAC-DOM) > 425 Fountainhead Circle #204 > Kissimmee, FL 34741 > > Domain Name: KMAC.COM > > Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact: > Piel, K Scott (KSP5) ScottPiel@LHOUSEENG.COM > 1-407-935-9939 > Billing Contact: > Batten, Larry (GL536) glay@MID-NIGHT.COM > 757-686-3060 (FAX) 757-686-3060 > >If you follow the click-through you get a pagefull of links >to porn sites, each in a twisty little domain, all alike. >Alike, that is, in having our boy Larry Batten running them. >MID-NIGHT.COM is the umbrella, and oddly enough they all >seem to be in the same netblock. In fact, IDCSRC they are >all on the same host. Fancy that. > >At a quick guess clever little Larry set things up so that >the records would look like he was his own upstream. That >way complaints about kmac.com would go to mid-night.com >and so forth. > >DCS shipped a head's up to Digex yesterday but so far no >response (<IAGO> Why are we NOT surprised? </IAGO>)

To: kmac who wrote (597)	5/1/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: Mark Winkel	Respond to of 698

Thanks KMAC, but no apology necessary ... Thanks for the apology KMAC, but it was unecessary. My original post (#593) would have been more effective had I been more succinct. The purpose of my post was merely to reaffirm a technical fact -- namely that LGPT's EFP/LNS technology is credible and has been patented. On some benchmarks, LNS technology does indeed outperform conventional floating point. I apologize to the members of this forum for writing a long post (#593) when a shorter post would have sufficed. I wish to remain neutral regarding LGPT's commercial prospects and thus will seldom post to this forum. However, on rare occasion I will make a post to reiterate the technical facts -- LGPT's technology is credible. Regards, Mark Winkel XLNS Research (voluntary disclosure: long LGPT)