SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (80308)5/1/1999 10:56:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim and Intel Investors - Favorable review of i810 chipset from Tom's Hardware guide

www6.tomshardware.com

To long to post in its entirety, but here's a snippet:

By Brent Kerby and Tom Pabst
" Intel flexes their muscles and shows their technological dominance in the low-cost chipset arena. Up to date there have been a several attempts to design a fully integrated chipset. Unfortunately, this type of integration in the past went hand-in-hand with lack-luster 3D performance. Most of the integrated chipset solutions shipping now provide acceptable performance for productivity software (e.g. word-processing, home finance, and Internet browsing). But when the user would slap their favorite 3D game title in to the CDROM drive instead of entering a cartoon like 3D world with full motion video it was more like a watching a slide-show. The reason for horrible 3D performance was due to the video implementation in the chipset. Most of these integrated chipset solutions use UMA (Unified Memory Architecture) where the integrated video allocates the required frame buffer from the system memory. By sharing the system memory the integrated video is limited to slow 66MHz-memory access. This slow memory access along with rudimentary 3D features integrated into most of these chipsets equated to HORRIBLE 3D gaming. Finally, Intel has provided the 810 Chipset solution to meet the low price demands of consumers without completely ignoring the performance requirements of 3D gaming."


PB



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (80308)5/1/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, maybe I was speaking without thinking in my last post. My initial impression of E-Machines is the same impression that I have of Hyundai. Very low prices, but don't even ask about reliability.

Maybe I'll be proved wrong in the near future. Luckily for E-Machines, people are more likely going to blame their system crashes on that oh-so-reliable Windows 98.

Tenchusatsu