Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (12501)	5/1/1999 2:49:00 PM
From: on parole	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Mr. Loser-my feeding will come from the owners of the 60 million share short position-yummy crunch-luv those bones! That does sound evil, Mr. genius. LOL

To: Mike Gold who wrote (12501)	5/1/1999 2:49:00 PM
From: SwampDogg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

If there was a 60 million share short position how has MDIN risen in value? Did MDIN rise well the shorts were shorting? If what you say is true MDIN would be under a dime...then you might have a short covering rally. How do you expect logical people with any knowledge to believe this crap? OVER AND OUT FOREVER!!!!!

To: Mike Gold who wrote (12501)	5/1/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

I've never shorted a stock before. The operative word being "before". Why short a stock that's rising? Now that the ride's over, now you can start shorting! Look out below, here come the short-sharks! And then everyone can move over to NPEC and do the whole thing over again. What a great game this is!

To: Mike Gold who wrote (12501)	5/1/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 25548

Hi MIke, I've been reading with disinterest the last couple of hundred posts on MDIN. The only truly salient point I can determine (and it gets repeated over and over in different words) is that WLD and a few others are insinuating that you and some of the thread regulars are fraudulent, crooked, misleading, lying, etc. WLD's last post: . look out below, here come the short-sharks! And then everyone can move over to NPEC and do the whole thing over again. What a great game this is!" Although they have not provided evidence to support their insinuations (indeed, have not clearly specified their insinuations, but have just intimated vague and ephemeral allegations of wrong doing), yet it is still disconcerting. To what do you attribute these vague attacks without leaving any syllogisms that could serve to create an argument--that could then be rationally debated? Is there a personal beef being played out here, or what? It doesn't make any sense. In a couple of hundred posts, no true accusations have been made, but insinuations have been strewn everywhere. PM me if you wish. Thanks, Barry