SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mani1 who wrote (56961)5/1/1999 9:25:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572982
 
Re: "I call BS on this. I have already explained twice, if you did not understand then, one more explanation isn't going to help."

Your explanation was that somehow the sub $600 market wasn't part of the sub $1000 market. You're right. Explaining it again won't make it true this time either.

Re: "This issue has been discussed many times. If you think that AMD knew exactly all the problems they were going to have and flat out lied about it, you need to stop smoking what ever it is you are smoking."

It has been discussed many times and you only hear what you want to believe. Regardless of what you or I agree or disagree on, this one will be decided by jurors who hear the case(s), or AMD will settle OOC for a nice chunk of the cash they got for just such an occasion.

Re: "I nominate your post as one of the all time worst."

I'm crushed...

EP



To: Mani1 who wrote (56961)5/1/1999 10:45:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572982
 
Mani - Re: "AMD sold more than 3 times the processors at 400 and
higher in march compare to Jan and Feb combined. Where did all the new buyers come from all the sudden. "

Most probably these 400 MHz BUYERS came from that group that ONCE bought the slower 350 MHz Kmart 62s, and no longer buy those uncompetitive 350 MHz Kmart 62's.

The "net-net" is NO ADDITIONAL customers for AMD.

Paul