SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andmoreagain who wrote (4412)5/2/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: RMiethe  Respond to of 29987
 
Andmoregain-- I am not an expert in any of the technical issues that Qualcom and Globalstar management have covered. I just give my own personal readings on issues (having owned Globalstar for a number of years now and read far too much than I should have had to)--some statements I read here are misinformation or misconceptions, and I make comments on them.

No one has all the answers to anything-- if I did, I certainly would not be working. So, to answer your question, there are many on this board who contribute and my comments are no better, and I hope no worse, than theirs. As the saying is: do your due diligence at all times.

I do think that there is far too much minituiae discussed on this board, however, whose purpose I can't quite get. Just on the questions of does Globalstar work in a building? Of course it does. Someone posted here once you have to go to a window to make a call on a Globalstar phone. The answer is: Sometimes you may, and only in heavily buildinged areas. Just one point of misinformation then.

I have printed some of the posts here about link margins and CDMA discussions and sent them to people in the satellite communications field. Almost all of the posts are wrong, or only partially right. So what do you do? Investors like me start worrying: Does the technology work, because you read that this part of Globalstar doesn't work under these circumstances, or that, etc. And then you find out that the posts are technologically wrong. For the technological issues, probably a doctorate in engineering is a good place to start. I have no such background, or even close to it.

So, concluding: do your own due diligence, and get a good background in satellite engineering, or access to those who do have the background. A lot of the problems with the satellite discussions today remind me of the issues about cell towers and their technology some 25 years ago. Few understood the details back then, and it is obvious that that is the case today with satellites.



To: Andmoreagain who wrote (4412)5/2/1999 10:36:00 AM
From: gdichaz  Respond to of 29987
 
To Andmoreagain: RMiethe has contributed facts, analysis and perspective to this thread which I for one appreciate. I welcome his views which seem to be well informed. Actually, the only person who did anything at all similar in my experience was Readware on the old AOL board who I found very helpful also. You do not need to act based on his posts, what you do is up to you, no? For myself, I look forward to learning more from RMiethe on this thread. Chaz