SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ABFG - AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonkie who wrote (3286)5/2/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: zonkie  Respond to of 4128
 
(oops I meant to adress this to you Kowboy, I'll do it over. I apologize again.)
_____________________

Kowboy did you miss this???????????

The shareholders are waiting!!!!!!!!

_____________________________________________

Kowboy the man from the Astros says you talked to him 6 times and told you that there was no contract. You said you were going to get right back to the thread as soon as you found out whether ABFG had lied about already having a contract for the ad in right field. You said you were "outta here" if they had lied. Why did you change your mind? Does anyone agree with Kowboy that this was a simple miscommunication?
___________
exchange2000.com
To: Cindy Powell (1761 )
From: Kowboy Monday, Apr 19 1999 4:09PM ET
Reply # of 3140
Howdy again, yall!

Listen, everyone.....The whole issue as to whether
ABFG is for real comes down to this Houston Astro
question in my opinion. If it turns out that ABFG
has lied about this AD, than they are nothin' more
than a scam. If they would chose to lie to their
shareholders about this advertisement - they would
certainly be willin' to lie about the rest. If
they have told the truth about this AD, than as far
as I'm concerned they will continue to get the
benefit of the doubt. It's just that dam# simple!
If they lied - I'm outta here! If they told the
truth than I'll stay in the ABFG saddle for the
entire ride. I'll know here shortly and report
back to this thread ASAP!
_____________________
Anyone interested in getting the truth out should read this---> exchange2000.com
Jeff Mitchell say's

I talked to the same guy Kowboy talked to at the Astrodome. He keeps a log of all his calls and said at the time I called that Kowboy had called "six times" up to that point. Obviously Kowboy was quite nervous about something. The contact also told Kowboy the same thing he told me:
1) ABFG had no contract,
2) the only person from ABFG that the contact had talked to was Kellner,
3) I believe he said he and Kellner only talked once, but I'm sure he said they had only talked that week, which was well after the banner was supposed to have been in right field,
4) a right field banner costs $180,000 a year and was already taken, so it was impossible for ABFG to have even asked for it, and
5) no one in his office had ever discussed an ad deal with ABFG, let alone promised an ad spot in a place that was already occupied!
_____________________
exchange2000.com
To: Kowboy (3195 )
From: zonkie Saturday, May 1 1999 7:16PM ET
Reply # of 3285

>>>>>>> Kelly was told that the deal was "in the bag", in fact it wasn't, as I clearly stated in my last post. He did not take the time to verify this and announced it BEFORE the deal was signed.<<<
Then if I follow you right you are saying that an employee who was in negotiations with the Astros said that Kelly could announce that there would be a banner in the right field section of the Astros and the deal was in the bag.
______________________
exchange2000.com
To: zonkie (3197 )
From: Kowboy Saturday, May 1 1999 7:33PM ET
Reply # of 3285

Well, first of all.....No one lied! As I stated earlier in one of my posts. I believe a lie is when someone INTENTIONAL tells another person something that they KNOW is not true in order to deceive.
I do NOT believe that to be the case here and furthermore, there was in fact, talks about an AD with the Astros and now they have confirmed that for me with a fax on the Astros letterhead. At worse...This was a simple miscommunication about the final stages of a negotiation over an AD.
___________________