Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (1351)	5/3/1999 4:30:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3795

"Let that be realized. No survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge, the impulse of the ages, that mankind shall move forward toward his goal. " Winnie C. and Johnny Walker. No compromiser he Da Ruddy Bridish Empah! Imagine. And in the 55 years since the Great War nobuddy has breathed a word about CANADA's part. We wuz part of the Bridish Empah! We Wuz! There was the Empah Club and DOMINION DAY. We should have never let the frogs spoil all that. Dey gots control of the mind of the nation and with revolutionary zeal and all their powers of control they have washed that sensibility from us that we were first and foremost a British Colony formed from the Anglo Saxon Law and government. Of course it was Oligarchy Supremo and rights were secondary to ORDER, but A.S. it was, and richly so. We are to disregard this heritage. Orders of Chairman Trudeau and Chairman Chretien, of the club internationale de new control and destination. "Let us eschew all things of the Ruddy Island and chart a new course where others vision has a predominant say." On the subject of suits I think it is time to hire one or get an opinion on the likelihood of their (BW's) predominance before the narrow courts. A letter drafted noting the date of the prank and the lack of responsibility of the authors for whatever harm (caveat emptor) and the lack of intent to do wrong leaves this suit of imagined embarassment without a firm position of injury with which to pursue. In short it is frivolous and a waste of the court's time. One should file for dismissal. Otherwise unrepresented it will cost you in many assertions of the other side. I doubt that it will go far. One hopes. EC<:-}