SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: teevee who wrote (18943)5/2/1999 9:32:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Teevee
Thats What I'm saying lots of holes get poked in the pipes to see if the grade is uniform I thought thats what I said.
Winspear Dykes already proves there are large stones from the NW Pennisula and most likely will contain larger stones from there as the 6000 ton sample is basicly in the same place.This still does not prove the dyke is uniform from north to south or west to east.That is why Winspear in the first place wanted 3 2000 ton samples one was suppose to be on the north shore but the they never found where it came to surface yet as the lake drilling was more important.Thats why I say its important to find some Bigger stones in the Lake from core samples
this will help prove the dyke is uniform.

PS IF And I state IF there are no bigger stones found in the lake with those cores lots of people will state how do we know its UNIFORM though out Snap Lake thats a pretty big area(Snap Lake)The Bulk Sample
is coming from a very small part of Snap Lake.

This is not to Knock Winspear these are just Questions that will most likely come after the bulk sample is in.I for one hoping there are larger stones in the core smaples as this will help preove the theory of Snap Lake Dykes.