SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yofal who wrote (24510)5/2/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: Doren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Hey, here is some good news posted from me for a change:

APPLE TO OUTSELL WINDOWS AND NT BY MORE THAN 3:1 IN CREATIVE MARKETS

trendwatch.com.cnchost.com

And the trend is up.

doren



To: yofal who wrote (24510)5/3/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: Richard Habib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213177
 
Marc, while Apple and Intel may be doing some work to port OS X to Merced, it is not correct that OS X could be on Merced first. Microsoft is already running a 64 bit NT on Merced simulation. About 7 months ago I posted an article that indicated Windows 2000 (NT 5.0) may have incorporated alot of the changes under the hood to facilitate the move to 64 bit. Obviously can't vouch for the correctness of the statement. By the way, Intel has a "hard" deadline to tape out Merced in June for sample production this summer.

OS X on EPIC has been discussed on this thread quite some. Presently, it makes an uncomfortable fit. EPIC will be too expensive for consumer desktops until 2003 or so. In the meantime it will be only in $10K and up systems and primarily in $20K systems and up. Likewise OS X is not quite ready for high end enterprise work and Apple has specifically stated it has no interest in that arena for which it has little likelyhood of success. Rich