Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (18955)	5/2/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Rocket Red	Respond to of 26850

Denis Winspear has never Said Anything about the Small Mill so I have no Idea if in fact they did get one.It would sure help in the cost saving but then some guys would post the S***** Word cause it never went to a reputable lab for sampling. So its most likely better for now the samples are sent out.

To: ddl who wrote (18955)	5/2/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

I think that there was probably talk about a small mill, but I would bet that it never made it in or we would have heard about it at the meeting. I agree with teevee that consistent CF results from all over along with the bulk sample should be sufficient for a feasibility study and financing. I also appreciate that some folks would want more proof. I would bet that the same discussion has taken place elsewhere and that is why there was talk of 3 discreet and separate sample sites-and probably the small mill when it became apparent that 3 separate sites was not going to happen in a very short time frame. Plan "B" At this point I think that they will see how the sample and the CF results turn out. Increase in diamond prices and increase in tonnage with wide intersections gives some leeway.