SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (57047)5/2/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573857
 
Ten,

Show me some Winstone 97 benchmarks. After all, that was what was current when the PII was first released.

Let's see--a good way to get this might be to extract info from Tom's site. On the same infrastructure (socket 7) K6 improved it's Business Winstone 97 score going from 200 to 233 MHz by 6.55%. Improving the P55C-200MHz score by the same percentage, we get a Winstone score of 53.49. The PII-233 Business Winstone 97 score was 57.8. That's an 8% improvement.

I'm willing to bet the K7-500 is 8% faster than a PIII-500 on Business Winstone 99. After all, the K6-III with 2MB on the motherboard is already capable of beating the PII by this kind of margin.

Kevin



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (57047)5/3/1999 6:24:00 AM
From: Michael DaKota  Respond to of 1573857
 
<Remember the PII-233 wasn't much faster than the P55C-233.>

I agree....the cache of the pII233 was 1) double the size
2) it is running at 117,5 mhz instead of 66 mhz

So I think that a p233mmx clocked at 2*133 with 512kb cache
will outrun even a pII266 and maybe 300MHz.

My p200mmx was quite a bit faster at 250 MHz (83 bus) than my
pII233 .

As we all know socket7 cpu's are greatly depending on busclock (and inherently the cache speed).