SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: OpusX who wrote (15893)5/3/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: Marketeer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27722
 
From the Economist archive, "Internet radio" dated 2-13-99
economist.com

Robert, I think this is what you are looking for...

How well is net radio fulfilling its early promise?

RADIOS at work used to have an authentically blue-collar feel associated
with dented black plastic boxes blaring AM music in repair shops or
postrooms. The worker-hearer nowadays is as likely to be a young lawyer or
banker sitting in apparent quiet and listening with tiny earphones to the radio
on a computer.

To enthusiasts the Internet opens new worlds for an old medium. Gone are
broadcast radio's difficulties with waveband congestion. On the net, there is
virtually unlimited space for content. Small alternative stations can thrive
alongside mainstream powerhouses. Screens supplement radio sound with
song titles, liner notes and banner advertisements. Yet thanks to low
overheads (no radio towers, for example) spoken advertisements can be kept
to a minimum. On net radio, as webcasters are keen to point out, audio ads
usually take up less than three minutes an hour, a fourth or fifth as much as
traditional commercial stations normally run. And net radio, unlike the old sort,
is interactive: listeners can chat to each other, rate songs or click on a banner
ad to buy a disc of the music they've just heard—all while listening to the
radio.

It is an attractive vision and many exciting new stations are taking advantage of
web technology. But the novelty seems greater in places like Europe, where
radio was more regulated, than in America, where college and other local FM
stations have long broadcast alternative fare to small audiences. And even in
America, the net has yet to free radio entirely: webcasters there are currently
negotiating a statutory licensing fee with the Recording Industry Association of
America. And, however low their costs, net stations everywhere are still
having to struggle to make money.

The progress so far is nevertheless impressive. In its short life, Internet radio
has had to overcome several technical barriers. Streaming technology had to
improve: this allows studio servers to send a continuous flow or stream of data
through (but not to) a desktop computer, where it is converted into sound.
Streamed sound is usually no better than AM radio. Webcasters hope soon to
send FM-quality sound. On the receiving end, listeners need a multimedia
co-processor and a 28k modem or better.

Many of the 1,700 stations in America and Europe that stream audio (another
4,300 stations have websites but no audio) are standard broadcasters that
simulcast sports, music and news over the internet. A baseball fan in
Bucharest or a cricket fan in Cincinnati can listen to their teams' home
matches.

More exciting are the start-ups that exist only on the Internet. While most
web-only radio companies offer a selection of traditionally programmed
channels (“All Eighties”, “Soul Food”, “Baroque”), there are variations.
Listeners at ImagineRadio (www.imagineradio.com) choose which music they
want to hear and how often by rating artists. At Sonicnet (www.sonicnet.com)
Flash Radio neatly pairs animation with music.

The money-making side is also varied. Many music webcasters get payments
for generating music sales. Rather more money comes from advertising.
Banners (often hidden behind at-work listeners' spreadsheets and documents)
back up audio ads with, for example, telephone numbers or links to the
advertisers' sites. Ads are priced, in principle, according to the number of
individuals who read them. Because net listeners divide up fairly neatly into
groups, the advertisements, again in principle, can be tightly targeted. As Josh
Felser, president of the 100-station Spinner (www.spinner.com), puts it, “We
can deliver the right message to the right segment of listeners”.

By contrast, NetRadio (www.netradio.com) focuses on e-shopping. Its 150
news, music and entertainment channels draw to the site customers who spend
real money for real goods at NetRadio's virtual music and software stores.
George Burr, director of marketing, compares the radio programming to the
indoor amusement park that attracts customers to Minneapolis's Mall of
America: “Radio”, he says, “is our amusement park.”

Like almost everything else associated with the net, e-radio has come up so
fast nobody can be sure what will happen with it next. To boosters it is a
direct-marketer's dream, as listeners pick the music and the sort of ads they
want. But direct marketing does not need radio (think of Amazon.com). And
for serious music listeners, sound quality is still a problem that net radio has yet
to deal with.

Marketeer




To: OpusX who wrote (15893)5/3/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: kha vu  Respond to of 27722
 
After registering and logon, do a search on:
internet radio
for the time frame from:
Feb 1,1999 to March 1,1999.

You will have the article. It is a very good written on the commercial value of radio for the nets. This article is copyrighted so it is better that each of us go thru this process. ( do you see that THREE persons did some post on SI were sued by Business Wire)