Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REW who wrote (27201)	5/3/1999 8:29:00 AM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

REW, a couple of questions. 1. Why has the Signature deal been delayed from April 1st? Also, why are we just finding this out now? 2. What's this TEMPO deal? Is there a PR that I missed?

To: REW who wrote (27201)	5/3/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: slaffe	Respond to of 44908

Good morning Bob Indeed, if Marty were to join the board of directors, we may lose him as a poster here. However we must realize that this thread is about tsig. TSIG is not about this thread. Has shareholders of tsig we must do what is right for tsig and not this thread. We must ask ourselves if tsig would be better served with Marty on the BOD without thinking of the consequences to this thread. Marty is not now or has he ever been required to post here and as a matter of fact, his posts have diminished lately. Has a BOD member, while he may not be able to post, he will also not be allowed to leave the BOD without a press release and that pr would speak volumes to me. It is my opinion that the reputation of this thread has been seriously damaged in the last few months and that fact has not only damaged tsig's reputation in the eyes of si members but has also damaged the share price. Imo, tsig would have been better served by si by silence rather than the the barrage of garbage that was posted here. I do not mean to say that the thread should shut down, but rather that the thread should return to the thoughtful discussion that has been here of late. I also do not mean to imply that only positive discussion should take place. All sides should be presented. But when discussing only the negative, it is like discussing a mole on the face of a pretty girl. Soon all one sees is the mole and forgets that there is a pretty girl. If a psychological boost is needed from time to time, and I must admit that I for one has needed one lately. All one has to do is to read the last six months pr's (and that's a lot of reading). After reading the pr's then read the sec filings. It will become apparent that we have a tiger by it's tail, so to speak. We have a fast growing company that is adhering to it's business plan and making progress rapidly. This progress does not come without a price as is evidenced by the sec filings. It is my hope that RG surpasses Bill Gates in wealth <g> for we has shareholders will benefit. Those that can see this will hold their shares and accumulate at these bargain prices. That is not to say tsig is not a risky proposition. Tsig is definitely a ambitious company with a grand plan. It may as any company with such undertakings, fail. The risk here is very easy to determine. It currently is .31, the reward on the other hand is very complex to determine and imho is astronomical. As long as one does not risk money here that is needed short term and is willing to stay with tsig through the up's and down's that all fast growing companies have then imho, that investor will be rewarded beyond his wildest dreams. Steven J Lafferty