SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WEBNODE3 who wrote (1462)5/3/1999 12:06:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 3795
 
Thanks. Thanks very much. Anything else you would like to add?



To: WEBNODE3 who wrote (1462)5/3/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3795
 
Humbly report, W, thanks for answering regarding "calling the party of 3 that committed fraud . . ."

For the sake of humble argument, fiction as it were, conjecture and speculation, all in my humble opinion only, of course . . .

May I humbly consider the other side of the "coin?"

The side where money exchanged hands for a service to be rendered by [reference deleted]?

Was the service preformed? Fully? As advertised?

#Reply-9285543 & #reply-9285848 & #reply-9285997 are an interesting read from that question's humble point of view.

Cheers,

Svejk
proofsheet.com



To: WEBNODE3 who wrote (1462)5/3/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 3795
 
WEBDUD3, you are indeed adept at finding definitions of fraud. Now, can you find a single case of BW suing a REAL company for fraudulent statements involving REAL money and REAL victims who suffered harm?

Thanks in advance.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News