Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (18985)	5/3/1999 3:06:00 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

Hey Denis You put your finger casually on somethng that has been puzzling me since the beginning, and that is the relationship between the Snap fault and the cone sheet and/or the feeder source. Early on I asked and was told the fault predated the kim emplacement. how then does the sheet appear on both sides of it. Supposedly it's deeper down on the N shore, but nobody seems able to confirm how much, and whether it was a shift or exactly how it formed. Now we hear it may also be thicker, and that's OK so long as it is consistently diamondiferous with the GOOGLIES. Anybody got any fresh ideas on that?? Cheers