Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (21958)	5/3/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: RTev	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

IBM has been orchestrating this whole event from the start. Aha. Epiphany. It's all becoming much clearer now. IBM is behind it all (which explains why the lawyer who defended them in their long-running antitrust trial is now prosecuting Microsoft). But we've also learned from blankmind that the DOJ is a communist outfit (and a transvestite one at that). So now, I figure that must mean that IBM -- the ringleader in this whole thing -- is just a communist front organization. Is that the way it goes? And I know that aliens have to fit in here somewhere, but I'll wait to find out about their nefarious machinations.

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (21958)	5/3/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: ToySoldier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

Get off the propaganda bandwagon!! And I am sure the Communist are also involved in this MSFT Anti-Trust battle. Do you know how stupid your comments sound? At least it is something to get a good laugh at! Toy

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (21958)	5/3/1999 4:31:00 PM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

- IBM may end up damaging the Clinton Justice Dept's case: #1 - IBM use to be the #1 PC seller #2 - IBM, by its own admission, was making PC's that cost too much #3 - the IBM PS/2 was propritary architecture (what a pain in the neck that is) #4 - IBM could have bought in to MS-DOS, but IBM didn't want to spend the resources to do so.