Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (45323)	5/3/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Your recollection is right on and that is a PERFECT example of the exaggerated sense of self importance which is the hallmark of Ms. Harris. She can't even imagine she really is full of it. JLA

To: Bill who wrote (45323)	5/3/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Bill, didn't some of the relevant posts end up on this thread? I seem to recall the same context...

To: Bill who wrote (45323)	5/3/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Yep gnet paid a bunch of money for a promotion on the Holyfield fight. Imo it was on-topic, I was making a joke with Glenn Rudolph about how fights weren't the draw they once were after the ear incident. There are no personal slams on that thread, except for one guy who is an antagonist. There isn't anyplace on that thread for teenage crap, its the best investment thread on SI. There is a place for one-liner insults and it is here on the coffee shop threads, or on general discussion threads. When JLA made his "appearance" 3 guys from there asked me if they should msg SI to get rid of him. Ironically I was using browsemaster that day and didn't even see JLA. Next time he pollutes the best investment thread on SI with his personal crap I can assure you he will be gone, and good riddance. Oh but I forgot he owns 2mm+ of Amazon therefore his behavior is acceptable - NOT