SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dav who wrote (14541)5/3/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: FR1  Respond to of 41369
 
Barron's said in its "Up & Down Wall Street" column that the largest Internet retailer's shares are worth 25 at most,

Those same experts thought Standard Oil was one of the worst investments anyone could make. Not worth a nickel. Gasoline in a horseless carriage? Insane!! Who's going to speed along on top of a gasoline bomb with just a joy stick to keep them from disaster? Tulip mania, I tell you!

What's the old saying: those that can do, those that can't become experts, journalist and consultants.

If the guys at Barrons know so much and have such successful portfolios, why are they spending their lives writing articles?

Just bored with their yachts, I guess.



To: dav who wrote (14541)5/3/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Michael Kucera  Respond to of 41369
 
Re: Amazon.com saw its shares plunge 12.2 percent after Barron's said in its "Up & Down Wall Street" column that the largest Internet retailer's shares are worth 25 at most, according to Bloomberg. Shares of Amazon lost 21.12 to 150.93.

I think that same column also said AOL was worth 5/share not too many splits ago so they know next to nothing or less than nothing when it comes to predictions. (i've always wondered who Alan Abelson really works for!) All this internet valuation talk reminds me of a good warren buffet comment: If the essay question on a final exam for a securities analysis class were to ask for the proper valuation model for an internet stock, how would you answer it? ...he replied by saying that anyone who tries to answer the question would automatically flunk.too many uncertainties,too many loose-ends.



To: dav who wrote (14541)5/4/1999 12:13:00 AM
From: Sonny McWilliams  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
Yes. I mentioned this ridiculous article in Barrons. They must have taken this right out of the mouth of one of those analysts sev. weeks ago. I guess they fig. that today was another good day to decorate their pages with garbage talk. Amzn was up in after hours.

Sonny