Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (29132)	5/4/1999 7:47:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik	Respond to of 152472

I think it is "Katie" bar the door. Jon. eom.

To: JGoren who wrote (29132)	5/4/1999 8:40:00 AM
From: Valueman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Much thanks to Clark as well, and let's not forget Walt Houston's thorough analysis of the 3G proposals. By the way, where is Walt? No posts since March 31--are you out there Walt?

To: JGoren who wrote (29132)	5/4/1999 8:55:00 PM
From: Morgan Drake	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

This is exactly what I was complaining about. Q needs a first rate, James Carvill type of PR machine to combat the ERICY et al. distortions and to toot CDMA's horn. It is commercially insane not to go on the offensive with the CDMA technological superiority and benefits story. You hearld truth from the mountain tops. You don't hide it in the basement. As a matter of fact, I believe that Q's silence in this regard in effect amounts to a constructive breach of fiduciary obligation to its shareholders. Somebody needs to wake up old man Jacobs and inform him that he needs to fire and hire a bunch of people. IM-non-HO, Morgan