Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KYA27 who wrote (122050)	5/4/1999 8:37:00 AM
From: KYA27	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Network World article mentioned - "Cisco is the only major vendor that won't take part in the Network World/Tolly Group Switch Metric test program. Hardly a leadership position", full artcile below: --------------------------- How is Cisco different from 3Com, Allied Telesyn, Alteon, Anritsu, Cabletron, Compaq, D-Link, Extreme, Foundry, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Lucent, Madge, Nbase, Neo Networks, Nortel/Bay, Olicom, Performance Technologies, VIPswitch and Xylan? Cisco is the only major vendor that won't take part in the Network World/Tolly Group Switch Metric test program. Hardly a leadership position. The Switch Metric is de-signed to make it easier for you to buy switches. It determines a relative cost for each gigabit of throughput you're buying, analogous to the cost-per-MIPS metric used to benchmark computers. With vendors these days talking about wire-speed this and wire-speed that, the Switch Metric is a tool to help you sort out competing claims. Tests are conducted on an ongoing basis, and the results will be available through the Network World and Tolly Group Web sites. Our first article on the tests will appear next week, based on examinations of 15 switches from nine vendors. (For details, go to www.nwfusion.com and enter DocFinder: 1235.) NetWorld+Interop has committed to a special session in which Tolly Group experts will showcase our findings. All the vendors listed above think the Switch Metric is a good idea - except Cisco. Cisco says customers aren't interested in performance tests, but rather want "systems tests" that focus on "robust features and essential functionality to run mission-critical enterprise networks." "This is analogous to only studying the Colorado River while trying to understand the magnificent ecosystem of the Grand Canyon," one executive told us. Whew! It's hard to argue against Mother Nature. In fact, we agree that testing those higher-level functions makes sense. We continue to do that. But the Switch Metric is a baseline that will help you determine how solid a foundation all those higher-level functions are built on. Cisco says you don't need this information. I couldn't disagree more. If you're a Cisco customer, ask your rep why Cisco won't make your life easier by taking part in the Switch Metric. If you're one of Cisco's competitors, you should be getting every customer to ask that question. - John Gallant, Editor in chief jgallant@nww.com --------------------------- IMO, Gbit startups such as Extreme, Foudry and Alteon have already taken mkt share away from CSCO. Just take a look at many of the Internet Portals and ISPs where they're using these startups switches. In the ATM WAN switch mkt, ASND (LU) and FORE already taken a big lead. (See previous post on ATM WAN switch) Seems like going into the low-end consumer mkt segment to make up for these, afraid will meet similar faith like COMS, which if it is, will drop the price to the 40s in no time. All imo.