Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Macklin who wrote (18962)	5/4/1999 9:08:00 PM
From: sh	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20681

That's ridiculous. The only persons who were underhanded were those in control of the Naxos Board. They agreed to a certain slate of directors and then backed off for some reason (guess lack of trust of Bob Gardner). Had they not done that, the AGM would have turned out much differently. As for the votes, I don't know the legality of management's position. However, if the vote proceeded with all the proxies allowed to vote, it was obvious those in control of the company would be gone. As things currently stand, who knows how long Naxos can and will stay afloat. Hope you are happy.