Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (1695)	5/4/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 3795

agreed

To: The Philosopher who wrote (1695)	5/4/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3795

Yep, we are. Every post here. I hope you stick around&#151the legal insight is helpful. I'll send you a T-Shirt if I can ever get them printed: webnode.com <gg> -MrB

To: The Philosopher who wrote (1695)	5/4/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: jbIII	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3795

Christopher, I'm enjoying reading your posts but I would be surprised if 216PI is related to [reference deleted]. The reason is this post from 216PI , #reply-9302757. This person seems to have been around SI much longer and has a knowledge of things that a relative newcomer or should I say plant from [reference deleted] would probably not pick up on so quickly. Taht is just my opinion. I wonder if he's ever been sarcastically called Auntie?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (1695)	5/4/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3795

Chris I can almost assure you that these new coffee shop members are the stooges from another thread that were touting a very dubious stock. They have a grudge against others because they brought out the truth about the stock. Similar to Cindy and yEllens case except they didn't want people to know who they are. z.......